Mars Not So Wet after all?
Mark Peplow
Nature
____
Soon after NASA's robotic rover Opportunity began exploring Mars, it found minerals and rocks that its handlers said were evidence of a warm, wet history.
But two groups of scientists have now questioned this interpretation.Most scientists agree that water flowed on Mars's surface at some point. The planet has deep valleys similar to Earth's own Grand Canyon, which are thought to have been carved by rushing water.
But it is unclear whether all the water on Mars came in sudden bursts a long time ago, when meteorites battered the ice deposits of the young planet, or whether some stood about in warmish puddles later in Mars' life, which might have given life time to evolve.When Opportunity touched down on a part of Mars called Meridiani Planum, it came across geology that looked tantalizingly like the product of standing water.
The researchers running the mission wrote that "surface conditions at Meridiani may have been habitable for some period of time in martian history".Opportunity found a scattering of tiny round pebbles that looked as if they had formed in water, and rectangular holes in the crater wall that could have been left by dissolved mineral crystals.
The team also saw ripple patterns in the rock, and a layering that looked like sediments that had settled out of water.But in this week's Nature, other researchers suggest an alternative, dry, explanation. Paul Knauth, a geologist from Arizona State University, Tempe, and his colleagues argue that all these features were produced by a surge of rock, minerals and brine caused by a meteorite impact, along with chemical changes from groundwater - but no pools.
Burt points out that any water in the area would have left channels, deltas and other shoreline features that Opportunity has not found.
Dec 22, 2005
Mark Peplow
Nature
____
Soon after NASA's robotic rover Opportunity began exploring Mars, it found minerals and rocks that its handlers said were evidence of a warm, wet history.
But two groups of scientists have now questioned this interpretation.Most scientists agree that water flowed on Mars's surface at some point. The planet has deep valleys similar to Earth's own Grand Canyon, which are thought to have been carved by rushing water.
But it is unclear whether all the water on Mars came in sudden bursts a long time ago, when meteorites battered the ice deposits of the young planet, or whether some stood about in warmish puddles later in Mars' life, which might have given life time to evolve.When Opportunity touched down on a part of Mars called Meridiani Planum, it came across geology that looked tantalizingly like the product of standing water.
The researchers running the mission wrote that "surface conditions at Meridiani may have been habitable for some period of time in martian history".Opportunity found a scattering of tiny round pebbles that looked as if they had formed in water, and rectangular holes in the crater wall that could have been left by dissolved mineral crystals.
The team also saw ripple patterns in the rock, and a layering that looked like sediments that had settled out of water.But in this week's Nature, other researchers suggest an alternative, dry, explanation. Paul Knauth, a geologist from Arizona State University, Tempe, and his colleagues argue that all these features were produced by a surge of rock, minerals and brine caused by a meteorite impact, along with chemical changes from groundwater - but no pools.
Burt points out that any water in the area would have left channels, deltas and other shoreline features that Opportunity has not found.
Dec 22, 2005
